<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get this party started</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whiteperil.com/2005/11/10/get-this-party-started/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whiteperil.com/2005/11/10/get-this-party-started/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Classical Values</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2005/11/10/get-this-party-started/comment-page-1/#comment-1877</link>
		<dc:creator>Classical Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 15:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1013#comment-1877</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Running against an incumbent is tricky business!&lt;/strong&gt;

Two heads are better than one. It took Sean Kinsell to make me finally figure out Senator Rick Santorum&#039;s reelection strategy. After trying without much success to make sense out of his strategy, I&#039;ve finally concluded that he&#039;s running an...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Running against an incumbent is tricky business!</strong></p>
<p>Two heads are better than one. It took Sean Kinsell to make me finally figure out Senator Rick Santorum&#8217;s reelection strategy. After trying without much success to make sense out of his strategy, I&#8217;ve finally concluded that he&#8217;s running an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Scheie</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2005/11/10/get-this-party-started/comment-page-1/#comment-1876</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Scheie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1013#comment-1876</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pennsylvania is weird.&quot; Three truer words have not been spoken. But Santorum seems to equate weirdness with stupidity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Friday (Veterans Day, when politicians seem to love such things), Santorum raised the ante from a &quot;scheduling conflict&quot; to a full-blown assault on Bush for insufficiently strong language. This was at the same time, same state, as Bush&#039;s controversial speech, and was attributed to another scheduling conflict. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Santorum has my sympathy, as it must be tough facing a pro-life Democrat. But if he runs to the right of himself and Casey holds the center, I&#039;m not sure there are enough Toomey-style voters to carry it for him. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I didn&#039;t know any better, I&#039;d almost swear that Santorum wants to be running against an incumbent. Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with an anti-incumbent strategy, mind you. But isn&#039;t Santorum overlooking something?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pennsylvania is weird.&#8221; Three truer words have not been spoken. But Santorum seems to equate weirdness with stupidity.</p>
<p>On Friday (Veterans Day, when politicians seem to love such things), Santorum raised the ante from a &#8220;scheduling conflict&#8221; to a full-blown assault on Bush for insufficiently strong language. This was at the same time, same state, as Bush&#8217;s controversial speech, and was attributed to another scheduling conflict. </p>
<p>Santorum has my sympathy, as it must be tough facing a pro-life Democrat. But if he runs to the right of himself and Casey holds the center, I&#8217;m not sure there are enough Toomey-style voters to carry it for him. </p>
<p>If I didn&#8217;t know any better, I&#8217;d almost swear that Santorum wants to be running against an incumbent. Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with an anti-incumbent strategy, mind you. But isn&#8217;t Santorum overlooking something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Kinsell</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2005/11/10/get-this-party-started/comment-page-1/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Kinsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 05:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1013#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>But Aron, that was &lt;a href=&quot;http://whiteperil.com/posts/1101069883.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for the children&lt;/a&gt;.  It&#039;s always okay if it&#039;s for the children.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I&#039;ll be very interested to see what Casey offers.  Joseph Hoeffel, the null set who ran for the Dems against Specter last year, will not be a hard act to follow, certainly.  A lot will depend on how Santorum pitches himself.  I don&#039;t think his hissy over the Bush administration when Bush was in PA a few days ago is going to do him many favors, but voters could forget all about that within a year.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Aron, that was <a href="http://whiteperil.com/posts/1101069883.shtml" rel="nofollow">for the children</a>.  It&#8217;s always okay if it&#8217;s for the children.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be very interested to see what Casey offers.  Joseph Hoeffel, the null set who ran for the Dems against Specter last year, will not be a hard act to follow, certainly.  A lot will depend on how Santorum pitches himself.  I don&#8217;t think his hissy over the Bush administration when Bush was in PA a few days ago is going to do him many favors, but voters could forget all about that within a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aron</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2005/11/10/get-this-party-started/comment-page-1/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>Aron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1013#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure, Sean, it will come as no surprise to you that I consider Santorum to be one of the more odious Senators, and am very pleased at the thought that of his possible departure.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Has he managed to establish a credible in-state residency yet?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure, Sean, it will come as no surprise to you that I consider Santorum to be one of the more odious Senators, and am very pleased at the thought that of his possible departure.</p>
<p>Has he managed to establish a credible in-state residency yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
