<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why can&#8217;t we all just argue?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whiteperil.com/2006/01/04/why-cant-we-all-just-argue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whiteperil.com/2006/01/04/why-cant-we-all-just-argue/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2006/01/04/why-cant-we-all-just-argue/comment-page-1/#comment-2115</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 06:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1126#comment-2115</guid>
		<description>Good stuff, thanks.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Kinsell</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2006/01/04/why-cant-we-all-just-argue/comment-page-1/#comment-2114</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Kinsell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 12:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1126#comment-2114</guid>
		<description>Derailing into Camille is almost always worthwhile, honeychile.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I normally don&#039;t recommend the short and easy thing over the long and hard thing, especially when it means screwing up chronology, but in this case I think it makes sense.  I&#039;d begin, that is to say, with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0679741011/qid=1136456462/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-0559311-2318464?s=books&amp;v=glance&amp;n=283155&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sex, Art, and American Culture&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;There are a couple of reasons.  One is that that book contains the preface to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0679735798/qid=1136456705/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/002-0559311-2318464?v=glance&amp;s=books&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Sexual Personae&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; as Paglia originally intended it to appear; the &lt;i&gt;way&lt;/i&gt; shorter version that actually appeared in &lt;i&gt;Sexual Personae&lt;/i&gt; doesn&#039;t really adequately prepare you for the maelstrom you&#039;re about to be plunged into.  Also, some of the other long pieces--her notes from one of her arts classes, the &quot;Junk Bonds and Corporate Raiders&quot; book review, and the transcript of her lecture at MIT--are a good setup for her overall mindset.  In fact, I&#039;d read those before skipping toward the front of the book for the reprints of shorter book reviews and op-ed columns.  They&#039;re all good, but they&#039;d probably be kind of disjointed and confusing as a starting point.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;It&#039;s from there that I&#039;d recommend &lt;i&gt;Sexual Personae&lt;/i&gt;.  Beyond that, you&#039;ll want to read &quot;No Law in the Arena&quot; from &lt;i&gt;Vamps and Tramps&lt;/i&gt;, but by 1994 Paglia&#039;s media-celebritihood was at its peak, and you can see from other stuff in the book that she was getting soused on it.  You may find a lot of it skippable, though you&#039;ll be eating it all up if you&#039;re a convert by then.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Enjoy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derailing into Camille is almost always worthwhile, honeychile.</p>
<p>I normally don&#8217;t recommend the short and easy thing over the long and hard thing, especially when it means screwing up chronology, but in this case I think it makes sense.  I&#8217;d begin, that is to say, with <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0679741011/qid=1136456462/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/002-0559311-2318464?s=books&#038;v=glance&#038;n=283155" rel="nofollow"><i>Sex, Art, and American Culture</i></a>.</p>
<p>There are a couple of reasons.  One is that that book contains the preface to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0679735798/qid=1136456705/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/002-0559311-2318464?v=glance&#038;s=books" rel="nofollow"><i>Sexual Personae</i></a> as Paglia originally intended it to appear; the <i>way</i> shorter version that actually appeared in <i>Sexual Personae</i> doesn&#8217;t really adequately prepare you for the maelstrom you&#8217;re about to be plunged into.  Also, some of the other long pieces&#8211;her notes from one of her arts classes, the &#8220;Junk Bonds and Corporate Raiders&#8221; book review, and the transcript of her lecture at MIT&#8211;are a good setup for her overall mindset.  In fact, I&#8217;d read those before skipping toward the front of the book for the reprints of shorter book reviews and op-ed columns.  They&#8217;re all good, but they&#8217;d probably be kind of disjointed and confusing as a starting point.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s from there that I&#8217;d recommend <i>Sexual Personae</i>.  Beyond that, you&#8217;ll want to read &#8220;No Law in the Arena&#8221; from <i>Vamps and Tramps</i>, but by 1994 Paglia&#8217;s media-celebritihood was at its peak, and you can see from other stuff in the book that she was getting soused on it.  You may find a lot of it skippable, though you&#8217;ll be eating it all up if you&#8217;re a convert by then.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2006/01/04/why-cant-we-all-just-argue/comment-page-1/#comment-2113</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 22:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1126#comment-2113</guid>
		<description>Not to derail or anything, but- Speaking of Camille Paglia, I&#039;m interested in getting into her, but I&#039;m unsure of where to start. I am looking at Sexual Personae. Any thoughts?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to derail or anything, but- Speaking of Camille Paglia, I&#8217;m interested in getting into her, but I&#8217;m unsure of where to start. I am looking at Sexual Personae. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classical Values</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2006/01/04/why-cant-we-all-just-argue/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Classical Values</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=1126#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;(Following my internal anarchy, wherever it leads)&lt;/strong&gt;

From the Grand Stand has an excellent, thoughtful post on groupthink versus true individuality:once you remove all the external cosmetics, the adornments and affectations, what you&#039;re left with is what&#039;s inside</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(Following my internal anarchy, wherever it leads)</strong></p>
<p>From the Grand Stand has an excellent, thoughtful post on groupthink versus true individuality:once you remove all the external cosmetics, the adornments and affectations, what you&#8217;re left with is what&#8217;s inside</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

