<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 辞職</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 10:38:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/comment-page-1/#comment-3744</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=2172#comment-3744</guid>
		<description>She might have the &quot; appeal&quot;, but she doesn&#039;t have what it takes to run a country!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She might have the &#8221; appeal&#8221;, but she doesn&#8217;t have what it takes to run a country!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/comment-page-1/#comment-3463</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 02:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=2172#comment-3463</guid>
		<description>Okay, I tried responding to you, Janis, but I got an error message, and the comment was lost.  Basically, though, my response was:  yes, it bothered me.  I&#039;m not sure it was the informality that was the problem--after the Clintons, anything short of a rambunctious slumber party in the Lincoln Bedroom seems like an admirable show of restraint--but the constant diversion of attention to it.  Maybe Bristol independently insisted on appearing at her mother&#039;s speeches to show support.  I don&#039;t know.  But she and her then-beau certainly looked uncomfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I tried responding to you, Janis, but I got an error message, and the comment was lost.  Basically, though, my response was:  yes, it bothered me.  I&#8217;m not sure it was the informality that was the problem&#8211;after the Clintons, anything short of a rambunctious slumber party in the Lincoln Bedroom seems like an admirable show of restraint&#8211;but the constant diversion of attention to it.  Maybe Bristol independently insisted on appearing at her mother&#8217;s speeches to show support.  I don&#8217;t know.  But she and her then-beau certainly looked uncomfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis Gore</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/comment-page-1/#comment-3462</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=2172#comment-3462</guid>
		<description>Did Bristol&#039;s pregnancy during the campaign bother you?

It did me.  I hate to be a prude, but I didn&#039;t care for it.  I know young people make mistakes, but parents don&#039;t usually subject them to a national stage.

I&#039;ll repeat, I objected to the way the Bush girls dressed at the convention speech in 2004.

I expect some formality at that level of government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Bristol&#8217;s pregnancy during the campaign bother you?</p>
<p>It did me.  I hate to be a prude, but I didn&#8217;t care for it.  I know young people make mistakes, but parents don&#8217;t usually subject them to a national stage.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll repeat, I objected to the way the Bush girls dressed at the convention speech in 2004.</p>
<p>I expect some formality at that level of government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/comment-page-1/#comment-3461</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 01:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=2172#comment-3461</guid>
		<description>Oh, I agree. I thought she was a very appealing person, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I agree. I thought she was a very appealing person, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis Gore</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/comment-page-1/#comment-3459</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=2172#comment-3459</guid>
		<description>But she does have appeal, and it&#039;s not just sexual.  My stepson loved her because she sounded more like &quot;a normal person,&quot; he said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But she does have appeal, and it&#8217;s not just sexual.  My stepson loved her because she sounded more like &#8220;a normal person,&#8221; he said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/comment-page-1/#comment-3458</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=2172#comment-3458</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that was the sort of thing that worried me, too.  It&#039;s one thing to point out that a smooth talker isn&#039;t necessarily saying anything more substantial than a folksier talker.  It&#039;s another thing entirely to say that you don&#039;t need to know what you&#039;re talking about to say something substantial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that was the sort of thing that worried me, too.  It&#8217;s one thing to point out that a smooth talker isn&#8217;t necessarily saying anything more substantial than a folksier talker.  It&#8217;s another thing entirely to say that you don&#8217;t need to know what you&#8217;re talking about to say something substantial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janis Gore</title>
		<link>http://whiteperil.com/2009/07/03/%e8%be%9e%e8%81%b7/comment-page-1/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator>Janis Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whiteperil.com/?p=2172#comment-3457</guid>
		<description>She lost me during the debate with Biden when she flatly refused to answer a question and said, paraphrased,  &quot;I want to talk about this.  Yada, yada, yada ...&quot;

That goes to the point in the Vanity Fair article where she reportedly listened to Halcro talking about numbers, professed amazement at his grasp, then said none of that made a difference to the audience.

She was right, to a point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She lost me during the debate with Biden when she flatly refused to answer a question and said, paraphrased,  &#8220;I want to talk about this.  Yada, yada, yada &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>That goes to the point in the Vanity Fair article where she reportedly listened to Halcro talking about numbers, professed amazement at his grasp, then said none of that made a difference to the audience.</p>
<p>She was right, to a point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

