Crowded commuter trains would likely be a major contributor to the rapid spread of influenza in the event of an outbreak of a new strain in Japan, researchers have found.
A simulation performed by researchers from the University of Tokyo's Institute of Industrial Science and the National Institute of Infectious Diseases found that crowded commuter trains increased the number of infections, and suggested that halting them could decrease the number of infected people by as much as 30 percent.
Numerous simulations on the spread of new strains of influenza have been conducted, but the latest one is reportedly the first to take commuter trains into account.
...
The study found that without taking commuter trains into consideration, it would take about 50 days for the number of infected patients to peak, and more than 400,000 people would be infected.
However, when commuter trains were added into the equation, at a rate of 5 infections per 100,000 people per day, researchers found that it would take a dozen or so days for the number of infections to peak, with the number of patients increasing to 500,000.
I'm not an epidemiologist, but WTF? How is it possible to model the spread of a potential epidemic in contemporary Japan and just kind of NEGLECT to take the trains into account? Did they forget? Did they not feel they could map train travel effectively? That doesn't make sense--presumably civil engineers and railway schedulers have to do that kind of thing all the time. Very strange.
Added on 17 January: WTF? Where the hell are all these Australians coming from? Not that there's anything wrong with being Australian. Some of my best friends are Australian. My favorite band is Australian.
Kylie's Australian.
But normally, I have about five Australian visitors a week, and I know them all by name. Is there a sudden fashion there for American poofs living in Japan?
Oh, that's it. Thanks to Tim Blair for the link. Not to take anything away from Gaijin Biker, who has a very good blog, but I do feel compelled to point out that if it's Greenpeace's tomfoolery we're talking about, Ross at Romeo Mike's posted about this several days earlier.

I've been saying this for a while -- if the flu pandemic materializes the US (outside a few eastern cities) will be lightly hit in relation to the rest of the world. Our love affair with the car will protect us. It's not how the ecological mythos would like it to happen, but there it is.
Of course, I hope a flu pandemic doesn't happen. Even Japan and Western Europe, for all their packed commuter trains and buses would be lightly hit in comparison to the third world which has that plus sucky hygienic/health care conditions.
I think modelers are seriously underestimating the impact of a pandemic in terms of deaths.
P.
Portia, yeah, that's always seemed likely to me, too. It's truly amazing how many people's germs you can come in contact with, even on a not-really-packed train and even if you think you're being very careful.
It has a closer meaning to 'Serves you right' in English
Not exactly the same fuinki as 'Take that, hippy' though